In an era where the cure for mental distress is often found at the bottom of a prescription bottle, we've engaged in what can only be described as one of the most dangerous experiments on our youth. The widespread prescription of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) has not only been a massive public health blunder but an outright betrayal of trust. Holistic doctors, who operate on the fringes of conventional medicine, have long argued that SSRIs rank among the top five most harmful mass-prescribed drugs, joining the ranks of NSAIDs, Statins, and Acid Reflux PPIs. However, SSRIs possess a uniquely malevolent trait: they can lead to the death of those who aren't even taking them, through acts of violence that are as shocking as they are out of character for the perpetrator.

The normalization of mass shootings in America is perhaps the most visible, yet least discussed, symptom of this pharmaceutical debacle. We've gone from a time when students carried rifles to school for sports to an era where such events are met with a resigned sigh from a public inured to tragedy. But let's pause to ask: what has fundamentally changed?

The narrative we've been spoon-fed is one of mental health crises and the need for more medication, more surveillance, more control. Yet, there's an elephant in the room, a correlation that's so glaring it's been systematically ignored or dismissed under the guise of "correlation does not imply causation." Since SSRIs entered the market, there's been a noticeable uptick in incidents of extreme violence, particularly among young people prescribed these drugs. This isn't mere coincidence; it's a pattern that's been documented through lawsuits, hidden clinical trial data, and the personal tragedies of countless families.

Consider the black-box warnings on SSRIs, a stark admission by the FDA of the increased risk of suicidal behavior in young adults. This alone should give us pause, but it's just the tip of the iceberg. The side effects of SSRIs extend far beyond despair; they include violent psychosis, a state where individuals engage in acts they'd never consider in their right mind. The narratives from those who've witnessed or survived such events often share eerie similarities—sudden, uncharacteristic aggression or a descent into a dissociative state where violence seems the only escape from an internal torment.

But why the silence? The pharmaceutical industry, with its vast influence over media, politics, and healthcare, has effectively bought the silence of critics. Since Bill Clinton's administration allowed direct-to-consumer drug advertising, Big Pharma has not only become the largest advertiser in media but also a key player in shaping drug policy and public perception. This financial muscle has been used to stifle any discourse linking SSRIs to these violent outcomes, branding skeptics as conspiracy theorists or anti-science.

The mechanism of SSRIs, blocking the reuptake of serotonin much like cocaine does with dopamine and norepinephrine, should raise alarm bells. Initially marketed for depression, their use has been expanded into every corner of mental health treatment, often based on flimsy evidence or outright marketing rather than scientific merit. Prozac, the pioneer SSRI, set a precedent with 39,000 adverse event reports within nine years of its introduction, including hundreds of suicides and violent crimes. This wasn't just the result of a few bad apples; it was a systemic issue, revealing a drug class that could induce the very behaviors it was meant to mitigate.

The evidence is there, buried under layers of corporate spin and regulatory oversight that seems more interested in protecting the market than the public. Large studies have shown that half of those prescribed SSRIs discontinue use due to intolerable side effects. Additionally, there's a significant percentage of users who develop bipolar disorder, sexual dysfunction, and severe withdrawal symptoms upon cessation. Even more chilling, taking an SSRI during pregnancy has been linked to an increased risk of birth defects. These drugs don't just numb pain; they numb life itself, leading users to describe feelings of emotional anesthesia, where joy and sadness blend into a grey monotony.

And yet, we continue to witness this cycle: after each mass shooting, the media and political discourse pivot to gun control or increased mental health services, which often means more psychiatric medication. The irony is suffocating—the very drugs prescribed to manage mental health are part of the problem. The SSRI narrative has been protected by a wall of silence, funded by pharmaceutical interests, but the truth is leaking out. The link between SSRIs and violent acts, once whispered in medical backrooms, is now being shouted from rooftops by conservatives, activists, and those who've lost loved ones to this tragic pattern. It's time to break the silence, demand accountability, and reconsider how we treat mental health, not with a pill that can turn children into killers, but with care that truly heals.

P.S. It is estimated that over 50% of American women (young and old) are now using mind-bending psychotropic drugs that have been prescribed by a medical doctor. Why do women all-of-sudden have psychological conditions that require treatment? Could it be that is because our culture, especially traditional female culture, has been destroyed by over 50 years of Leftist social engineering at our schools, in our media, and in the [Woke] entertainment that is presented to them by the enemies of mankind who obviously want to destroy women rather than lift them up? I think so.