As the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election approaches, an alarming strategy is unfolding within the ranks of the Democrat Party, one that threatens the very foundations of our republic. With the election mere days away, the Democrat leadership, backed by significant financial and intellectual support from figures like George Soros, appears to be preparing not for a peaceful transition of power, but for conflict and potential civil unrest should they face electoral defeat. This preparation includes the 'Democracy Futures Project,' a series of wargames that involved 175 key figures from politics, academia, and the military, aimed not at ensuring electoral integrity but at strategizing how to subvert a Trump victory.

The rhetoric from Democrat leaders like Kamala Harris, who labels Donald Trump a "fascist," and President Joe Biden, who derogatorily calls Trump's supporters "garbage," isn't mere political hyperbole. It's a calculated move to dehumanize political adversaries, creating an environment where violence against them might be seen as a lesser evil compared to their supposed threat. This kind of language has historical precedence in places like Rwanda, where dehumanizing terms like "cockroaches" were used to justify genocide. The comparison isn't only with past atrocities but also with historical villains like Adolf Hitler, a narrative pushed to equate Trump’s potential governance with tyranny, thereby justifying any resistance, including violent means.

Mainstream media outlets and daytime television shows have played a pivotal role in this narrative. Hosts like Joy Reid and members of The View have not shied away from using similar dehumanizing language, further entrenching the division. This rhetoric, combined with academic and think-tank discussions, conditions the public for the notion that a Trump win equals the end of democracy, thus legitimizing extreme responses.

The strategy seems to extend into influencing military and law enforcement. Reports of General Mark Milley's actions during the Trump administration, where he allegedly circumvented presidential authority, suggest a readiness among some military leaders to act against what they might perceive as an unconstitutional order. This is further complicated by narratives suggesting Trump's disregard for military decorum, painting him as a leader who might misuse the armed forces for personal gain.

The 'Democracy Futures Project' is particularly disturbing. Held in Washington, D.C., these wargames were not simple simulations but rather a strategic session to normalize the idea of overturning an electoral outcome. Participants included former governors, cabinet members, and military officers, discussing not how to ensure a peaceful transition or address voter concerns but how to actively resist a Trump victory through potential cabinet rebellions, military non-compliance, and civil unrest.

Previous instances of political unrest, like the riots following the 2016 election and those sparked by George Floyd's death, are cited as precedents. The scale of damage from these events was significant, with over 200 police officers injured in D.C. alone, and damages reaching over $2 billion nationwide. The Democrats, in this scenario, are not just preparing for protests but are allegedly setting the stage for riots of unprecedented scale.

Intellectuals and former government officials have been vocal about the need to resist a Trump presidency. Articles and interviews in prestigious publications have called for mass mobilization, suggesting that civil society and private industry should act against Trump's supporters. This isn't about protecting democratic norms; it's a call to subvert them.

There's an underlying narrative of a 'Deep State' at work here—a network of influential figures ready to undermine Trump's potential victory. This isn't about ensuring fair play but about orchestrating a response to an election result they find unacceptable.

The orchestration of such wargames and the propagation of divisive rhetoric signal a dangerous trend where electoral outcomes might be contested not through legal or democratic means but through force. This strategy by the Democrat Party and its backers not only undermines the democratic process but risks plunging the nation into chaos, potentially leading to a civil conflict. It's a stark reminder that the battle for democracy must be fought with integrity, not with plans for violence or coups. The real threat to American democracy might not be from the candidate they oppose but from the strategies they employ in their opposition.