Did you know that in 1965, people of [ethnically] European descent (a.k.a. "white people") made up over 28% percent of the world's population. Today, just 59 years later, we now make up less than 8% of the world's population. No other racial group in human history has ever seen such a drastic decline in their population over such a short period of time--NONE!

In fact, if current demographic trends continue without significant changes in fertility rates among European-descended populations and without massive shifts in migration patterns and the policies that govern those patterns, people of European descent will comprise less than 3% of the world's population in less than 100 years. Just like the Dodo bird which was too stupid to realize that it had enemies, and that it was under attack, Europeans will also soon be extinct.

The demographic decline of European-descended populations in the world since 1965 is not just a statistic; it's actually a testament to a catastrophic failure in policy-making, cultural leadership, and foresight by the criminal, illegitimate Globalist (Neo-Marxist) governments that have been ruling over us since about 1963 (the Year John F. Kennedy was assassinated). Here's my critique of the policies and cultural shifts that have led us to this crisis:

Instead of fostering integration and assimilation, policymakers have encouraged multiculturalism ("diversity") at the expense of cultural cohesion (unity). This has led to fragmented societies (ONLY in ethnically European countries) where the original cultural and ethnic identities are diluted or outright discouraged. The lack of emphasis on integrating immigrants into the prevailing culture has not only failed to replenish the declining [native] European populations but has also created isolated communities with little incentive to adopt or perpetuate the host nation's heritage.

The economic structures set in place since the mid-20th century have increasingly made family life unaffordable. Housing, education, and healthcare costs have skyrocketed, while real wages have not kept pace. Policymakers have prioritized economic metrics over family stability, leading to a scenario where having children is seen as an economic burden rather than a societal contribution. This economic environment discourages the natural growth of populations of European descent.

There's been a pervasive cultural narrative promoting smaller families (Anti-Natalist propaganda), or no children at all, under the guise of environmentalism or personal freedom. This narrative, pushed through media, education, and policy, has subtly (and sometimes overtly) portrayed large families as undesirable or irresponsible, directly impacting birth rates among ethnically European populations.

Universities, now breeding grounds for [far Left extremist] ideologies that often view Western culture with skepticism or outright hostility, have failed to instill a sense of pride or continuation in one's European heritage. Instead of education fostering a sense of legacy and continuity, it has instead preached a doctrine of guilt associated with our European heritage, thereby reducing the desire among young people to continue their lineage.

Governments have moved away from promoting any form of [white] national identity or pride, fearing accusations of nationalism (as if that's a bad thing) or even racism. However, this vacuum of identity leads to a lack of desire to propagate one's culture or ethnicity. When there's no value seen in preserving one's heritage, why would there be an impetus among Europeans to maintain strong population numbers?

Policies that could encourage childbirth, like comprehensive parental leave, affordable healthcare, and childcare, have been insufficient or poorly implemented. Conversely, policies supporting or not effectively countering the rise in delayed parenthood, or permanent childlessness through extensive abortion rights, have indirectly contributed to this catastrophic demographic decline.

The push towards globalism has often come at the cost of national interests, including the demographic health of nations of Europe, America, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. Policies favoring global economic integration (Globalism) over local or national community health have ignored the basic principle that a nation's first duty should be to its own citizens' continuity and prosperity.

This isn't just about the numbers, folks; it's about the survival of cultural, historical, and ethnic identities that have shaped much of what we recognize as Western civilization. The policymakers of ethnically European countries have not only failed to recognize this crisis but have often enacted policies accelerating this decline. This is a wake-up call calling on leaders and policymakers to rethink, reassess, and react to this slow-motion genocide that's taking place before the legacy of Europeans becomes a footnote in global history, not due to external conquest, but due to internal policy failures by the Globalist, New World Order political whores who pretend to serve us.

Replacement Migration Equals Ethnic Cleansing

In the shadow of political rhetoric and the guise of humanitarian aid, a profound and sinister strategy has been unfolding across the Western world, particularly in Europe and America, for decades. This strategy, often cloaked in the benign terms of "diversity" and "multiculturalism," is nothing short of ethnic cleansing under the banner of what's euphemistically called "Replacement Migration." The architects of this plan, including the United Nations with its Agenda 21 and George Soros through his Open Society Foundations, are orchestrating what history might one day judge as one of the most calculated demographic shifts in human history.

At first glance, the migration policies endorsed by the UN and supported by figures like Soros appear to be noble endeavors aimed at alleviating global disparities and conflict. However, beneath this veneer of altruism lies a stark agenda:

The influx of non-European migrants into ethnically European countries isn't just a matter of numbers but of cultural transformation. Indigenous European cultures, with their rich tapestry of history, tradition, and national identity, are being diluted at an alarming rate. This isn't migration for the sake of economic or humanitarian aid; it's a deliberate attempt to alter the ethnic and cultural makeup of nations.

The term "Replacement Migration" itself is telling. Why replace? The implication is clear: the replacement of the European population with another, under the pretense of solving demographic or economic issues, is a form of ethnic cleansing. This isn't about integration; it's about substitution; it's about dilution.

George Soros, through his vast network of NGOs, has been a pivotal figure in this narrative. His financial support for policies and initiatives that promote open borders and facilitate mass migration cannot be understated. Critics argue that his involvement transcends philanthropy, morphing into an ideological crusade to dismantle national sovereignty and cultural integrity:

Soros' funds have supported campaigns that advocate for refugee rights and less stringent immigration policies, often without regard for the cultural or economic impacts on host countries. This financial leverage is used to influence policy, sway public opinion, and undermine border controls.

By funding politicians and movements that align with his vision, Soros effectively steers the political discourse towards a borderless, culturally mixed Europe, which some perceive as form of ethnic cleansing, which is a recognized form of genocide.

The United Nations, through documents like the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, promotes a vision of the world where borders are little more than historical relics. This vision:

Undermines Sovereignty: By advocating for policies that reduce national control over immigration, the UN is complicit in a policy that treats countries not as sovereign entities but as global commons to be reshaped at will.

Ignores Cultural Impacts: The UN's approach often glosses over the socio-cultural ramifications of mass migration. The rapid demographic changes lead to social tensions, identity crises among the youth, and a fraying of the social fabric that has held Indigenous European societies together for millennia.

The consequences of this so-called "Replacement Migration" are profound:

Loss of National Identity: The unique cultural identities of ethnically European countries are being eroded. Traditions, languages, and customs are under threat, not by the migrants themselves, but by a policy that encourages assimilation into a global monoculture.

Demographic Displacement: Ethnically European populations are not just being diluted; they are, in many cases, being displaced from their neighborhoods, communities, and even entire countries.

Security and Stability: The rapid cultural shift has led to increased tensions, crime rates in some areas, and security concerns that threaten the stability of all Western nations.

It's imperative for Western societies to critically assess these policies. Are we truly aiding humanity by erasing our own cultural legacies? Is the preservation of national identity and cultural heritage not worth protecting? The orchestration of "Replacement Migration" by international bodies and billionaire influencers must be scrutinized not just for its immediate effects but for its long-term implications on the very essence of European civilization.

This isn't a call for xenophobia or against genuine refugees seeking sanctuary. It's a plea for a balanced approach where migration does not equate to the erasure of native populations and cultures. The West must ask itself: at what point does humanitarianism become a tool for demographic engineering? The time for such reflection is now, lest we wake up in a continent unrecognizable to our ancestors, where the echoes of our heritage are but whispers in a foreign land.